The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
The line graph compares three companies in terms of their waste production in tonnes from 2000 to 2015.
It is clear that both three companies experienced drastic fluctuations in their waste output over the period shown. While the amount of waste produced by companies A and B was relatively cut down, the figure for company C by contrast saw an increase.
In 2000, company A produced 12 tonnes of waste, while companies B and C produced at a lower level, around 8 tonnes and 4 tonnes respectively. Over the next 2 years, the waste output of companies B and C rose by roughly 2 tonnes, but the figure for company A fell by around 1 tonne.
The time between 2005 and 2015 witnessed a downward trend in the amount of waste of company A from 11 tonnes to approximately 8 tonnes. There was also a dramatic drop by roughly 7 tonnes in the waste production of company B. On the contrary, the figure for company C rose significantly to 10 tonnes over the same 10 - year period. Afteward, in 2015, company C produced the highest amount of waste material, and company B was the lowest with 4 tonnes of waste produced in total.
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 78
- The line graph below shows the number of visitors to Tabard Towers Theme Park each month last year 82
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 98
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[3]
Message: Did you mean 'form'?
Suggestion: form
...end in the amount of waste of company A from 11 tonnes to approximately 8 tonnes. Th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54679802956 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69418382628 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487684729064 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.3989945011 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.555555556 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382479675139 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183042653327 0.103423049105 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554068484433 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255901381011 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614721121721 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.