The graph below shows consumers' average annual expenditure on cell phone, national and international fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010.
The line graph compares the yearly spending on mobile phone, national landline and oversea fixed-line services in the United States from 2001 to 2010.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the amount of money spending on cell phone services while the opposite was true for the figures for national landline services. Also, the 9-year-period witnessed an insignificant change in international fixed-line spending.
Leading the chart at $700 in 2001, the expenditure of national line services however decreased gradually, reaching $600 in 2003. By contrast, with the spending of about $200 and $250, the mobile phone and international fixed-line figures respectively went up at the similar pattern, both stood at $300 over the next two years. After that, while the former dropped slightly before remained unchanged at $300, the latter experienced a continual rise in 2006 to the same $600 as comparing to the national landline spending.
From 2006, the American expenditure of cell phone service increased remarkably to become the top 1 spending in the end, at around $750. With approximately $150 lower, the second rank belonged to the residential fixed line in 2010. During the same 6-year-period left, there was a stability in the figure for oversea phone services, remaining its lowest position till the end.
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 78
- The chart below gives information about car ownership per household in the UK from 1975 to 2005 61
- The graph below shows consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line and services in America between 2001 and 2010 66
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$700'.
Suggestion: $700
...ed-line spending. Leading the chart at 700$ in 2001, the expenditure of national li...
^^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$600'.
Suggestion: $600
...s however decreased gradually, reaching 600$ in 2003. By contrast, with the spending...
^^^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$200'.
Suggestion: $200
...By contrast, with the spending of about 200$ and 250$, the mobile phone and internat...
^^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$250'.
Suggestion: $250
...st, with the spending of about 200$ and 250$, the mobile phone and international fix...
^^^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$300'.
Suggestion: $300
...p at the similar pattern, both stood at 300$ over the next two years. After that, wh...
^^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$300'.
Suggestion: $300
...d slightly before remained unchanged at 300$, the latter experienced a continual ris...
^^^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$600'.
Suggestion: $600
...ed a continual rise in 2006 to the same 600$ as comparing to the national landline s...
^^^^
Line 4, column 131, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$750'.
Suggestion: $750
...he top 1 spending in the end, at around 750$. With approximately 150$ lower, the sec...
^^^^
Line 4, column 155, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$150'.
Suggestion: $150
...end, at around 750$. With approximately 150$ lower, the second rank belonged to the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35096153846 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8242686059 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600961538462 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.83966804 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288189877554 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126310093755 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821883877499 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197844953523 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696614702276 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.