The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the average amount of carbon dioxide emitted by each citizen in four different countries over a period of 40 years.
Overall, both Italy and Portugal experienced a consistent growth in the volume of CO2 emitted between 1967 and 2007 but the opposite was true for the figures of the United Kingdom and Sweden. The British were by far the people releasing the highest amount of emissions out of four nations.
The first 10-year period witnessed a moderate increase in the emissions of Portugal from over 1 ton in 1967 to roughly 2 tonnes in 1977. Meanwhile, the figure for Sweden rose at a faster pace to over 10 tonnes. During the next decade, the amount of CO2 discharged by the Swedish fell drastically to approximately 7 tonnes while the emission figure in Porturgal rose continually by around three times in 1987. Until 2007, both two figures finished at the same level of approximately 5.5 tonnes.
Almost similar to Portugal’s, Italy’s emission figure shot of most of the years, leaping from more than 4 tonnes in 1967 to nearly 8 tonnes in 1997 and remained constant till the end of the period, making Italy become the second-largest emission figure of four countries. On the other hand, although the amount of CO2 released by each citizen fell steadily by around 2 tonnes over the period shown, UK remained its lead after all.
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 98
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- The graph below shows consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line and services in America between 2001 and 2010 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, while, after all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84188034188 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62006243307 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57264957265 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5438316887 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.888888889 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188362407572 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760001255106 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640839895675 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121974380657 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473708633721 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.