Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research,business and academic world, Others believe that some information is too valuable to be shared freely,
discuss both views and give your opinion.
What some groups of people opine is sharing all inquiries being acquired is crucial and beneficial in different terms while others do believe some data seem to be very extraordinary and influential to get shared freely and some exact price should be taken into consideration in order to gain an accessibility to such resources. This essay will elaborate on both sides of views.
On the one hand, by publishing free new data on websites or other platforms, people's horizons are about to expand in terms of knowledge and literacy. To be more precise, if locals and talented individuals are afforded a great atmosphere; they will wonderfully bloom in the society they are living in. The utopia like this gets formed by publishing and sharing new and unfolded knowledge around the territory, an example for this could a school once I had educated in a clearly all students cooperated with each other sharing new formula and all fruitful study methods that consequently led to passing tests with flying colors for all students. Therefore, sharing and letting people acquire new information just prompt better circumstances under which every constituent can bloom.
On the other hand, many experts and smart people strongly try to accomplish some tasks by which some unfolded data would get added to the universe. Although taking steps within this path is accompanied with both difficulties and joy, publishing such retained information freely is presumed to be absurd from my personal perspective. To illustrate, all efforts existing behind the story should be taken into consideration and therefore some value should just be set in order to compensate for all those hard workings. For instance, those specialists who do work on articles in an uncharted situation and who later find some valuable information are really respected and this respect would be shown by giving them this opportunity to earn money through this process; like some actions being taken by scientific websites which publish scientific essays. To sum up, what paying for new scientific information results in, is demonstrating others respect to these consistent and innovate people who previously had invested their money and time in this path.
All in all despite opposite contemplations existing around describing whether it should get prioritized to publish every inquiry free or not.I personally do opine respecting people who worked consistently should be prominent. This respect can be elucidated by the amount of money people pay just to gain accessibility to these data. Thus, this approach can lead to higher acceleration in terms of clarifying new methods and expanding new horizons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-17 | paniz_kiani | 67 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | CheeLee | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-05 | Sarina2021 | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-22 | khanhuyennnnnnnnnnnnn | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-23 | niloya | 67 | view |
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the world and in different continents Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- Whilst informational systems are now being utilized to aid the old some people are worrying about the possible negative outcomes To what extent do you agree with this statement 67
- the chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 73
- bar chart 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
What some groups of people opine is shar...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will elaborate on both sides of views. On the one hand, by publishing free new ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...der which every constituent can bloom. On the other hand, many experts and smar...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d their money and time in this path. All in all despite opposite contemplatio...
^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...ed to publish every inquiry free or not.I personally do opine respecting people w...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, really, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2245.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 425.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28235294118 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86502450215 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550588235294 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.4298701201 49.4020404114 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.357142857 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3571428571 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236814320955 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813206209937 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652088962157 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154437322597 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858391692004 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.