The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the amounts of CO2 emitted by each person in four countries from 1967 to 2007.
It is clear that each Swedish or UK person released less CO2 over the period researched, but CO2 emissions in Italy and Portugal showed a rise. Citizens in the UK were responsible for the largest amount of CO2 released all the time.
In 1967, about 11 tonnes of CO2 was produced by a UK citizen, followed by 9 tonnes in Sweden. In comparison, each Italian discharged over 4 tonnes which was approximately threefold higher than that of a Portuguese.
From that time onwards, the average quantity of CO2 released in the UK decreased gradually to under 9 tonnes while the figure for Sweden, after a 1-tonne climb in the first decade, also went down moderately to well under 6 tonnes at the end of the period. In contrast, more CO2 was produced by each person in Italy whose figure grew to nearly 8 tonnes in 2007, compared with an equally significant increase to roughly 6 tonnes in Portugal.
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now 11
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The maps below show the Happy Valley Shopping Center in 1982 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club think about the club s activities facilities and opening hours Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make any comparisons whe 78
- The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club think about the club s activities facilities and opening hours Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make any comparisons whe 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 829.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68361581921 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63813376322 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593220338983 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5672051278 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.428571429 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164043371178 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873274773895 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568765277736 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113067918327 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370186183575 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.