The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph gives information about changes in the emissions of carbon dioxide per person in four different countries during the period from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, there were general downward trends in the average amount of carbon dioxide in Italy and Portugal, whereas the United Kingdom and Sweden experienced a reverse pattern. It is also clear that the emission in Sweden showed the most dramatic change compared to the other countries.
Around 10.5 metric tonnes of CO2 was emitted in the United Kingdom in 1967, followed by about 8.5 metric tonnes in Sweden. Afterward, the amount of CO2 in the UK decreased constantly to roughly 8.6 metric tonnes in 2007. Over the same period, the figure for Sweden rose suddenly to reach its peak of just over 10 metric tonnes in 1977 before falling steeply to 5.5 metric tonnes in the following four decades.
In comparison, there were about 4 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide released in Italy, which was nearly twice as high as that of Portugal in the first year. After going up noticeably to approximately 8 metric tonnes, the emission of CO2 in Italy remained constant until ten years later, whereas the other country saw a continuous rise in its figure, to roughly 5.5 metric tonnes which is equal to that of Sweden.
- More and more people are opting for ready made food instead of home made food Do you think this option has MORE advantages or disadvantages 78
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 78
- SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT THE BEST WAY TO REDUCE CRIME IS TO GIVE LONGER PRISON SENTENCES OTHERS HOWEVER BELIEVE THERE ARE BETTER ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF REDUCING CRIME DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OPINION 89
- The picture below shows how a hot balloon works 73
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87557603687 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39689819166 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566820276498 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.4695626165 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.25 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236752893393 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113703445288 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678807972537 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16227594353 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669856306637 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.