The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the average amount of carbon dioxide emitted by each individual from 4 countries from 1967 to 2007.
Generally, British citizens were responsible for the largest amount of CO2 release over the period.
In 1967, about 11 tonnes of CO2 were released by each British person. The figure of which maintained the same amount until 1977, there was a slight downward trend which ended at about 9 tonnes. Followed by was Sweden, each Swedish citizen produced about 9 tonnes of CO2 in 1967. The figure then reached the peak when it increased by 3 tonnes after 10 years. However, it soon dropped significantly to roughly 5 in 2007.
Meanwhile, the trends of CO2 released by the citizen in Italy and Portugal were the same. The number of co2 produced by an Italian and a Portuguese citizen started at over 4 tonnes and roughly 1 tonne in respectively. Yet, they quickly escalated 4 more tonnes of carbon dioxide. From 1997 to 2007, both trends remained at the figure of tonnes in Portugual and roughly 8 in Italy.
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six area of the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the mai features make comparisions where relevant 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to AShdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking vistors how satisfied they were with their visit during the samw two periods 78
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76536312849 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57092519879 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569832402235 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.9320663891 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.5454545455 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2727272727 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133116211149 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567277281843 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494719234929 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875787634705 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478859954706 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.