The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the average amount of carbon was emitted by each person in various countries over the course of 40 years, starting in 1967.
Overall, it is immediately obvious that Italy, along with Portugal, experienced an upward trend, while reverse patterns were seen in the United Kingdom and Sweden. UK’s weight registers the highest figure over the period.
In 1967, a British released merely 11 metric tonnes. The statistic decreased gradually to around 9 metric tonnes in 2007. Likewise, Sweden’s rate underwent a dramatic fall to nearly 6 tonnes after peaking up at more than 10 metric tonnes in 1997.
In terms of Italy, its number raised steadily in the first 30-year period, which surpassed the rate of Sweden. Despite remaining stable in the remaining years, this nation was continuing to be the second-highest among all countries. Similarly, Portugal’s carbon emission by a person rose contemporary from approximately 1.5 to around 5 tonnes between 1967 and 1997. This was followed by slight growth in the last 5-year period.
- Both governments and individuals are spending vast amounts of money protecting animals and their habitat This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care To what extent do you agree 78
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give your 84
- The table below shows the number of cars produced in three countries from 2003 to 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, likewise, second, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27058823529 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72591053325 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.705882352941 0.547539520022 129% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9594661154 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146104845837 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504098290574 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575574748788 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0815493337092 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317853966145 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.