The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in metric tonnes in four European countries namely United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal for each decade between 1967 and 2007. It is a clear and cohesive representation.
The countries of Sweden and the United Kingdom witnessed an overall positive trend with a significant drop in their carbon emissions. While UK experienced a gradual parabolic decrease over these decades, carbon emissions in Sweden, though less than the UK’s, first rose up slightly between 1967-77 and then falling sharply to an all time low by 2007.
On the other hand, Italy and Portugal added up to their overall average emissions throughout these years. Both the countries show a linear increase with a similar slope in their emission levels, which remain higher for Sweden throughout.
Overall it can be observed that while the developed countries have tried to control their carbon footprint around the world, the developing are yet to take action to control let alone reverse the emission levels.
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society.To what extent do you agree? 73
- A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both these views and give your o 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34319526627 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54257538958 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668639053254 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9820984104 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288047342914 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126169152232 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128426922576 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178120425131 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131916269799 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.