The graph below shows average carbon dioxide(CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph compares annual level of carbon dioxide production per individual in four different European nations between years 1967 and 2007. The quantity of emission was calibrated in metric tonnes.
Overall, United Kingdom had remained the highest emittor of the greenhouse gas for 40 years of survey ;however, in Portugal, emisssion of this gas is the lowest among the countries. Similarly, UK and Sweden were showing decreasing trend in CO2 emission wherelse increasing pattern was witnessed in Italy and Portugal.
Despite gradual reduction of quantity of CO2 production in UK from nearly 15 metric tonnes in 1967 to about 9 in 2007, it had been most notorious for emitting CO2 comparing to other countries. Portugal, on the other hand, experienced significant rate of increase in carbon dioxide production, although it was the most environmentally friendly nation among these four European nation during the duration of survey.
At the begining of year 1967, the second highest emitter (slightly above 8 MT) of the gas was Sweden emitting more than twice of the quantity emitted by, a third ranked nation, Italy. However, with combination of proliferation in emission pattern in Italy ,and reduction in Sweden resulted in switching of their place in the list after 1987 when equal quanitity of Carbon based gas was emitted by both countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 254, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...oliferation in emission pattern in Italy ,and reduction in Sweden resulted in swit...
^^
Line 13, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ased gas was emitted by both countries.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, similarly, third, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76838499645 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.4775436477 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.375 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245364743322 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102881813327 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670318034966 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149767844905 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564803248599 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.