The graph below shows the average house prices in 3 countries between the years 1997-2014. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
As far as the first year of the surveyed stint is concerned, approximately 135k the average of house prices was recorded in country A, followed by 3 years the figure for house prices has slight increase. Moreover, the proportion of accommodation prices in country A overtook the figures of country B in 2001 and then had a significant increase to approach 510k, in 2003. In addition, after 4 years, the figure for house prices in country A had some fluctuations at this time, and from 2007 to the end of the period, the statistics of country A had substantial growth during that time.
Thereafter, the average of house prices in country B was twofold compared to the figure for country C, prospectively 250k and 125k, in 2000, and had a significant increase from 2001 to 2004, with nearly 300k recorded in 2004, while the statistics of country B continued sharply increase until the end of the period. Furthermore, the figure for accommodation prices in country B, whose figures fall within a range of from 100k to 240k, between 1997 and 2008, and had a slight fluctuation until the end of the period.
- Some people thinks scientific research should focus on solving world health problems Others think that there are more important issues Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people feel that the government should regulate the level of violence in films of television and cinema Others feel that violent films should be not released Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Technology can bring many benefits But it can also cause social and environmental problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
- The graph shows information about the average number of visitors entering a museum in summer and winter in 2003 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75520833333 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83528100184 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489583333333 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.4317360399 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 182.6 112.824112599 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.4 22.9334400587 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4 5.23603664747 237% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181750555862 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117147022275 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044814177558 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157789829072 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262768167429 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 13.2329268293 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.83 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.