The graph below shows the average house prices in 3 countries between the years 1997 - 2014. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant.
The graph illustrates the average prices of houses in Country A, Country B, and Country C from 1997 to 2014.
Overall, the house prices in the three countries increased throughout the period. Additionally, country C always had the lowest price house of the three countries per year.
From 2000 to 2003, the price in Country A significantly increased from around $200k to a high point of more than $500k, then declined slightly to under $500k in 2006 before rising back and reaching approximately $625k in 2014. Country B had the same pattern as Country A but had differences in the years occurring the peak and the dip, which were around $350k in 2005 and just over $250k in 2008 respectively.
Throughout the period, the house prices in Country C decreased dramatically in 2008 from almost $250k in 2007 to approximately $200k before coming back to 2007 levels in 2009. After that, there was a slight increase and reach around $260k in 2013 as the highest price of the house in Country C.
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid 61
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 73
- the table below show the number of motor vehicles per 1000 inhabitants in eight countries in 1990 and 2000
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: A_BUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'a bit'?
Suggestion: A bit
...untry B had the same pattern as Country A but had differences in the years occurring ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66860465116 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68059826996 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523255813953 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8445612459 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225451926334 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139702145339 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0958249043724 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188105937266 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102416956345 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.