Topic: The graph below shows the average house prices in 3 countries between the years 1997-2014. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph demonstrates the average house prices in three nations, including A, B, and C from 1997 to 2014.
In general, it is apparent that almost all three nations underwent a wild fluctuation throughout the examined period. However, it witnessed a positive rebound in house prices regarding country A, whereas the converse was true for the other countries till the end of the timeframe.
Looking at the graph, having recorded pretty similar house prices for the three countries in 1997, standing at roughly $125k, the average of house prices in country A remarked rising continually to reach around $175k in 2000. Noticeably, the figure experienced a rocketing increase to reach a peak at merely $525k in the next 3 years before falling considerably below the $500k line. Nevertheless, the average house prices recovered rapidly until the end of the period, making up nearly $625k.
Turning to the other countries, despite showing the same figure for house prices in 1997, there was a slight difference in the growth rate. The average house prices witnessed a dramatic increase in terms of country B to reach around $300k compared to a continual growth in country C hit close to $250k. After that, both countries underwent a significant plummeted hitting the bottom, making up $245k and $125k, respectively, in 2008. Then, there was a strong recovery for both countries until 2013 before declining again in the next year.
- Topic Advertising is becoming more and more common in everyday life Is this a positive or negative development 89
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Topic The pie charts show the size of classes in primary schools in four states in Australia in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Topic Schools should focus on academic success and passing examinations Skills such as cookery dressmaking and woodwork should not be taught at school as it is better to learn these from family and friends To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 78
- Topic It s true that people don t have time to cook anymore 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, nevertheless, regarding, then, whereas, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1183.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05555555556 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70722026555 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551282051282 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.35127363 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.3 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268742702902 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111911165087 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689440386962 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179719914848 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605860424222 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.