The line graph demonstrates the mean number of travellers who get to work using car, bus, and train over the course of 60 years from 1970 to 2030.
Overall, it is clear that car was the most popular genre of transportation and train was the least used mode of transport. However, the latter has been predicted that it would become the second most favourite vehicle for commuters.
Having looked at the bar chart more closely for details, from 1970 to 1980, the number of car, bus, and train users remained stable, at roughly 5,4,2 million commuters respectively. Between 1980 and 2000, the proportion of car travellers witnessed a dramatic rise from 5 million to approximately 7 million people while the figure for bus dipped slightly, from 4 to under 4 million people. The data for train commuters experienced a marginal increase, from 2 to precisely 3 million passengers.
From 2000 to 2030, the extent of car owners stayed unchanged at seven units for a decade, followed by a significant increase and peaked at 9 nine units in 2030. A similar pattern was seen in the number of train passengers. It remained stable at three million users for ten years, then surpass the number of bus passengers and reach its peak at 5 million people. The data for bus commuters will decline gradually and hit a low of nearly three units.
- These days mobile phones and the internet are very important to the ways in which people relate to one another socially Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Many countries apply to be the host of an international sporting competition such as Olympics but only one is ever chosen What are the benefits for a country of hosting an international sports competition Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvant 61
- The Chart below shows the value of one country s export in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information bu selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78695652174 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65384480509 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578260869565 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9033411556 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.1 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245218172644 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103003088269 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753593967081 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162778252464 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876680910595 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.