THE GRAPH BELOW SHOWS CHANGE IN PROPORTION OF GDP IN THREE AREAS IN A PARTICULAR COUNTRY BETWEEN 2000 AND 2O20
The line graph indicates how three factors namely health, education, transportation contributed to a country’s GDP from 2000 to 2015 and give predictions for 2020.
Overall, while the percentage of health and transportation increased substantially, that of education fell drastically. To be more specific, education made up the largest percentage in the first year and its position was replaced by medical care in 2015. In the future, it is predicted that the proportion of health will witness a dramatic growth; meanwhile, education and transportation will decline slightly in figures.
In 2000, not only health but also transportation represented 3% of the nation’s GDP, and a little bit higher than that was education, which accounted for 5%. However, by 2015, the proportion of health had surpassed that of education and reached 6% after rocketing for a decade. At the same time, about 4% and 4.8% of the GDP was contributed by transportation and education respectively.
In 2020, the statistics of health is believed to rise to 8%. Following the reverse pattern, education and transportation might undergo a slight decrease in numbers to approximately 3.5% in the final year.
- THE GRAPH BELOW SHOWS CHANGE IN PROPORTION OF GDP IN THREE AREAS IN A PARTICULAR COUNTRY BETWEEN 2000 AND 2O20 100
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London, 2000-2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 84
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...nted 3% of the nation's GDP, and a little bit higher than that was education, which a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39572192513 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38817216222 2.65546596893 128% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609625668449 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6019767635 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.111111111 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101645845257 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417647832247 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055102119048 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0714022165636 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708273540094 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.