The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011
The graph compares the overall prices of oil and food in all over the world from 2000 to 2011
As can be seen from the chart, the figures of oil and food prices experienced an upward trend over 11 years of the period. Moreover, the highest number was the data of food price while the oil price ended up at the lowest point.
From 2000 to 2004, the trends of both prices were closely smilar. In the first 4 years, the statistics of oil and food went through a period of fluctuations to 30 dollars per barrel and 105 points, respectively. The total number of food price in world wide saw a sharp increase at about 40 points in 2007. Futhermore, there was a significant climb in the oil price from 100 dollars to 150 dollars, followed by a fall at 20 dollars.
In the next 2 years, the figure of oil price reached a peak at nearly 135 dollars per barrel before going into free fall to just 40 dollars. The trend of food price was the same. The food price went up significantly to 220 points in 2008, then collapsed a half in 2009. While, the data of oil went through an erratic behavior then recovered to 100 dollar per barrel, that of food went up and down and reached the highest point at 240 in the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...vely. The total number of food price in world wide saw a sharp increase at about 40 points...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...vely. The total number of food price in world wide saw a sharp increase at about 40 points...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 349, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
... erratic behavior then recovered to 100 dollar per barrel, that of food went up and do...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.27467811159 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24781284853 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497854077253 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3197859323 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262940018857 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121342977038 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652283255196 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215679095764 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838161369898 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.78 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.