The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK (expressed in percentage terms).
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph indicates the data about how using cutting-edge technology transformed in four kinds of devices in households in England from 1994 to 2008. It is clear that there was an upward trend in high technology access in each tolls over the period shown.
In 1994, the percentage of houses owning CD players started at about 43% and it continued to increase progressively to 2004/05, at nearly 90%. This figure experienced a slight fall after that. The number of mobile phone users stood at under 20% in 1996/97, and went up gradually at approximately 80% in 2004. In the following years, the cell phone proportion stabilized, before rising minimally to around 79% in 2008.
Turning to the homes which install internet, the decade from 1998 witnessed a significantly growth in accessing numbers. Even though DVD player had no datas before 2002, it quickly climbed to more than 82% within 4 years. In 2008, DVD player percentages were highest compared to any others device.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, likewise, moreover, similarly, as regards, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04306220096 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84098539308 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9128461919 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8181818182 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0356113365244 0.215688989381 17% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0154904479135 0.103423049105 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0237150438217 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0314584816784 0.15604864568 20% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330487755316 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.