The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK (expressed in percentage terms).
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the percentages of using cutting-edge technology transformed in households in four different kinds of devices between 1994/95 and 2008 in the United Kingdom. Overall, there was an upward trend in four kinds of technological devices.
From 1994/95 to 1998/99 the number of houses having CD player increased continuously from about 45% to nearly 70%. As regards, from just 10% in 1998/99, the percentages of internet connection used in houses rose much more than 40% in the years of 2002/03. Likewise, CD player users went up gradually to about 83% in the next four years. In addition, the number of the CD player and internet connection users in England increased 10% and about 15% respectively in 2006/07. Moreover, in the following year, the percentage of CD consumers felt slightly 1% compared to 2006/07. By contrast, internet connection users continue to go up to 65% in 2008.
The number of mobile phone users experienced an upward trend which was about 16% in 1996/97 and reached nearly 80% in 2004/05. Similarly, the period between 2002/03 and 2006/07 saw a sharp growth of DVD players from 30% to 83%. Furthermore, the number of DVD player and mobile phone users continued to increase and reached 85% and 87% respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, likewise, moreover, similarly, as regards, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05769230769 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8400402114 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548076923077 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6710885705 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6363636364 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0356113365244 0.215688989381 17% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0154904479135 0.103423049105 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0237150438217 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0314584816784 0.15604864568 20% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330487755316 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.