The graph below shows consumers’ average annual expenditure on cell phone, national and international fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010.
The line graph illustrates the average spending per year on mobile phone, domestic and global fixed-line and services in US from 2001 to 2010.
Overall, it is visible that the category of international fixed-line mostly ranked the lowest and remained unchanged. Additionally, while the groups of cell phones services have tedency to increase the opposite was true for national fixed-line services.
Initially, the biggest money was spent on national fixed-line services which was $700 but only around $200 was for the two remaining. For cell phone services, there was a noticeable increase to $500, incomparison with a fall to $500 on national fixed-line services. At the same time, the figure for international fixed-line services fluctuated slightly over $300.
From the year 2006 onwards, the amount of average expenses in the category of cell phone services still grew from $500 to over $700 and become the most popular item with US’s residents. By contrast, the average yearly expenditure went up to $400 in the final year. During 4 years, a stability was witnessed in the figure for international fixed-line services.
- Any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government Do you agree or disagree 89
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate towards buying their products What problems does this cause What could be done to encourage people to buy local products The abundant financial resources of big 56
- The table below shows the average weekly salaries of men and of women working in different occupations 84
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions 84
- The diagram shows a museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, still, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22905027933 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92448362545 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569832402235 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.847761874 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31318932291 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150372913405 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697383564535 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225362412654 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598828654652 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.