The graph illustrates the consumption of fish and three kinds of meat in Europe from 1979 to 2004. Units are measured in grams.
In general, the consumption of beef and lamb decreased over the period while that of chicken increased. It is also worth noting that the expenditure of chicken was the highest and the lowest was fish.
To start with, there was fluctuation in chicken consumed over the whole period. The amount of chicken began at around 150 in 1979. In the case of beef consumed dropped to nearly 180 in 1979 but it recovered strongly by 60. And then, it went down moderately to above 100 until 2003 and there was a slight improvement at the end of the year. Turning to the used of lamb in 1979 had the highest point which was 150 then it fell to just over 50.
Meanwhile, the consumption of fish declined to just under 50 between 1979 and 1981. There was a small change before it decreased to about 40 in 1999. It remained constant in 2004.
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon, from egg to adult fish.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 56
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The charts below show the percentage water used for different purposed in six areas of the world. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, then, while, in general, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 789.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48295454545 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38646509525 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556818181818 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9437679397 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.75 112.824112599 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.6666666667 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162815294676 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630369267556 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738362233698 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11479082504 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665529389982 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.0 13.2329268293 53% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.11 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.66 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.