Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Other believed that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both views and give your ow

There is a controversial issue related today whether the information of scientific research, business and the academic world should be shared to everyone or it is necessary not to provide due to value of information.

It is possible to argue that the information have to be offered. This is because getting fundamental information is part of the human right. In another way, it is unfair that only few people know about the significant things in terms of life. Once people know about that, they tend to solve problems together by presenting their opinion. An example of this is demo. If there is a deteriorate problem in a research by abusing animals, minded people who agree with abolishing the research can work it together. Therefore, there is a good point in sharing information.

There is an opposite opinion that crucial details cannot be provided easily. It is often said that the value of details is equivalent to money because there is thing not to reveal. Thus, to be fair, there should be something to exchange with information in order to be worthy. To illustrate, in Korea, there are a lot of academies which help students to go to a high level of university. So, students usually pay for confidential information of education so that they can know things better than others and win competitions.

In conclusion, there are two different ideas in a topic whether it is significant to offer the information or not. This is due to the human right on the other side it is because of the worth of information.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...An example of this is demo. If there is a deteriorate problem in a research by abusing animal...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...o. If there is a deteriorate problem in a research by abusing animals, minded people who a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s a good point in sharing information. There is an opposite opinion that crucia...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8358778626 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88626600256 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541984732824 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2105831911 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4666666667 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4666666667 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.53333333333 7.06120827912 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205967046114 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633242200664 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061823918111 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128174783881 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613792563418 0.056905535591 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.