The table illustrates the data of sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 regarding five countries in Europe.
In general, the sales of both products had changes compare to 1999 and 2004. It is also worth noting that there were a big increase for sales of coffee and bananas.
To start with, in 1999, there was 1.5 millions euros for the sales of coffee. However, it increased to 18.5 millions euros in 2004. When it comes to Switzerland in 1999, the sales of coffee was 3 millions euros and after 5 years, it represented 6 millions euros.
Regarding the sales of bananas in Switzerland in 1999 and 2004, it was 15 millions euros, but it jumped to 47 millions euros. While Switzerland had the highest increase in both years, there were Swden and Denmark which had only a few changes. The money which was used for bananas in Sweden was 1.8 millions euros in contrast to 2004, it decreased to 0.8 millions.
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Other believed that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both views and give your ow 61
- The charts below show the percentage water used for different purposed in six areas of the world. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 79
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon, from egg to adult fish.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, regarding, so, while, in contrast, in general, in contrast to, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70909090909 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62987009424 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490909090909 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3270092052 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 5.23603664747 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176100167547 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921549445351 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830111810479 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148948552364 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945626714688 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.