The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.

The line graph illustrated the consumption of fish and three kinds of meat in European countries over a period of 25 years.

Overall, the amount of fish consumed in Europe remained at the lowest point between 1979 and 2004. The quantity of chicken was eaten expected to see an upward trend, while the figure of beef, lamb, and fish decreased over that time.

At the beginning, in 1979, around 220 grams were beef is eaten which are used by a person per week, compared to over 150 grams of lamb, 140 grams of chicken and approximate 60 grams for fish consumption. The amount of fish which was eaten followed a similar pattern to beef and lamb with a drop of roughly 35 grams from 1979 to 1981. By contrast, chicken consumption rose dramatically to nearly 170 grams, followed by a downturn.

Looking into the future, there was a gradual decrease in the amount of fish consumed, reaching the lowest point at just under 50 grams per person per week in 2004. By 2004, around 250 grams of chicken was used in Europe, the highest point of all the period. In contrast, the figures for beef and lamp consumed were 100 grams and over 50 grams respectively.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-24 pateldhruv1708 67 view
2020-01-22 mary.ssherr 67 view
2020-01-13 manhstorm 56 view
2020-01-13 manhstorm 56 view
2020-01-02 happyhappy 61 view
Essays by user manhstorm :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64077669903 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41848927948 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52427184466 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9330930159 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.222222222 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181232451856 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901352981522 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992892512238 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150813063432 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111620746509 0.0819641961636 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.