The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.

The line graph depicts how many grams fish, beef, lamb and chicken were eaten by European people in a week in between the year 1979 to 2004

Overall it can be manifested that beef was recorded the highest number of consumption for a meal in the beginning years, while fish had the least numbers

First of all, beef had the highest number of consumption Over 200 grams per week by European people in 1979. Fish had Over one-fourth(over 50) grams used for eating in the same year . While overtime use of beef was slightly down in the year 1981 and then grew up again and became more eat meat before it was. However, year by year European decline use of fish and gone down. Throughout, beef also less use for eating after the year 1987 and goes down from just under 250grams per week to over 100 grams per week in the year 2004 .fish had almost 50 grams per week remain same in two and half decades.

Secondly, the two types of meat had almost the same numbers(around 150) of gram consumption in the year 1979. After a year that over half of decade lamb consumption goes a sharply down, while the chicken was used over 170 grams per week and again cames down. Moreover, the use of chicken in the daily meal became the highest number at the end of the year 2004 and reached around 250 grams per. While the lamb was the type of meat became less popular by the time and stud up with figures of around 70 grams per week in the year 2004.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-16 unstoppable 73 view
2024-06-16 unstoppable 73 view
2024-06-16 unstoppable 73 view
2024-06-16 unstoppable 67 view
2024-06-16 unstoppable 73 view
Essays by user savan2206 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...highest number of consumption for a meal in the beginning years, while fish had t...
^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: That
...er week by European people in your 1979.That time , Fish had Over one-fourthover 50...
^^^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y European people in your 1979.That time , Fish had Over one-fourthover 50 grams ...
^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...European people in your 1979.That time , Fish had Over one-fourthover 50 grams us...
^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rthover 50 grams used for eating. While, over time use of beef was slightly down ...
^^
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... also less use for eating after the year 1987 and goes down from just under 250g...
^^
Line 5, column 439, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...less use for eating after the year 1987 and goes down from just under 250grams p...
^^
Line 5, column 532, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...over 100 grams per week in the year 2004 .fish had almost 50 grams per week remain...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 268.0 196.424390244 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.33582089552 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.0905550771 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462686567164 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 122.540235739 43.030603864 285% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 145.25 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 5.23603664747 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144905135431 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745371806947 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533863094764 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119889044767 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063921724232 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.82 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.4 10.3012195122 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.48 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 11.4329268293 232% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.