The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
(Write at least 150 words)

The line graph gives information about the amount of fish and other kinds of meat, namely chicken, beef and lamb, used in a European region from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, the figure for specific products showed different trends, whilst the consumption of chicken saw an upward trend, there was a downward trend witnessed in the quantity of three other kinds of meat used. Moreover, citizens of that country ate fish less than any other given products.
In 1979, the respective consumption of fish, lamb, beef, chicken was 60 grams, 150 grams, more than 250 grams, around 140 grams. Over the next ten years, the data of beef and lamb used decreased dramatically, followed by growth to approximately 240 grams and 120 grams respectively in nearly the year 1984. In the interim, the statistics of chicken consumed underwent a moderate rise of around 30 grams. The data of fish used declined gradually over that period of time.
From that point onwards, by 2004, the consumption of chicken continued its upward trend and reached 250 grams per person per week. While the quantity of beef and lamb used fell steadily, the amount of fish eaten stayed unchanged over the given period

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-05-05 Ahmad_off 78 view
2024-05-05 Ahmad_off 78 view
2023-05-29 baoquyen1906 56 view
2023-05-27 baoquyen1906 73 view
2023-05-27 baoquyen1906 73 view
Essays by user lethaianh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... fish used declined gradually over that period of time. From that point onwards, by 2004, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n stayed unchanged over the given period
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93467336683 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44778816018 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587939698492 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.722469292 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.111111111 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1469957056 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598371965249 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058829082821 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104703237258 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622157572035 0.0819641961636 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.