Some people believe that young people know about international pop and movie stars but know very little about famous people from the history of their own country. Why is this? How can more interest be created in young people to gain more knowledge about their own famous people from history?
It is true that teenagers nowadays are interested in overseas music and celebrities than in exploring well-known individuals in the past of their own hometown. There are a number of reasons behind this phenomenon and several solutions should be adopted to improve this situation.
There are two primary reasons why analyzing popular citizens in the past is less attractive than knowing about international pop and movie stars. The most noticeable one is that learning about famous people in history is considered to be a compulsory subject in school. This brings about history becomes naturally boring subject with too much knowledge. Indeed, young people feel like it is their duty, they have to do it whether they want to or not. In the interim, enjoying foreign music and celebs is regarded to be a hobby, a leisure activity. Moreover, the methods teachers use to convey knowledge of history to students are not attractive. In most schools in Vietnam, in history class, students do a sedentary activity is sitting and listening to the teacher reading the history book until the end of the class. In that way, students cannot remember that heavy knowledge with too many years and people. That is the reason why young people do not find examining famous people interesting.
Fortunately, several measures can be taken to prevent this issue. In reaction to the initial tendency, the most effective way to get to the root of the problem would be to improve the teaching methods. Teachers should combine the necessary knowledge with some entertainment activities which help students remember lessons all too well such as watching historical movies, Q&A games, etc. Besides that, having outdoor lessons is considered to be a great idea. It leads to a decline in the stress level of young people, helps students better at receiving lessons. For example, in grade eleven, I had an outdoor history class about writer Nguyen Trai, that trip helps me get lessons on not only historical knowledge but also soft skills.
In conclusion, it is clear that students losing interest in studying famous people in history is attributed to many factors, and steps need to be taken to address this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-03 | Chau Anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaâ | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-17 | lethaianh | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to two tourist destinations in Italy from 2005 to 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- In the past most people used to travel to their place of work With increased use of computers the internet and smartphones more and more people are starting to work from home What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development 61
- Some people believe that young people know about international pop and movie stars but know very little about famous people from the history of their own country Why is this How can more interest be created in young people to gain more knowledge about the 78
- Open plan office no walls no barriers Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 579, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ctivity. Moreover, the methods teachers use to convey knowledge of history to stude...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0635359116 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65332749975 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566298342541 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0133586006 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.833333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310394755241 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873403732329 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781584555578 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163545520062 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959451559583 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.