The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in an European country between 1979 and 2004
The illustration depicts information regarding the mass of fish and various categories of meat consumed by a person on average per week in a European nation from 1979 to 2004. Overall, there was a downward trend in the figure for beef, lamb, and fish, while the reverse trend was seen in the figure for chicken. Additionally, the chicken was the meat consumed the most by dwellers in that country at the end of the interval.
Regarding the consumption of chicken, the figure for this food was approximately 140 grams in 1979. Afterward, it experienced gradual increases to surpass beef and became the kind of meat consumed the most in 2004.
Concerning movements of beef, about 210 grams were digested in 1979. After witnessing a mild rise, it reached its pinnacle in the 1979-1984 period. Subsequently, beef underwent erratic behaviors, following by sinking a trough of 100 grams before making a slight recovery at the end of the interval.
In view of lamb, the amount of this food consumed was recorded at precisely 150 grams per person in 1979. Following that it moved in parallel with the declines in beef digestion, registering approximately 65 grams in 2004.
Over the period, the consumption of fish witnessed insignificant movements, becoming the meat consumed most negligible at the end of the period.
- Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings Some people find it is a positive trend while others think it is a negative development Discuss both points and give your own opinion 84
- Nowadays more and more people use online shopping Some people think it is a good development To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The maps show the changes of an office building between the present and the future 73
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at Forton Valley City from 2000 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2005 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, well, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06880733945 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89494609673 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518348623853 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0357913219 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.454545455 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172323990681 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695164508427 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489389363457 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100288330448 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472003574859 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.