The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates how much fish, lamb, beef and chicken were consumed by each person per week in a European country from 1979 to 2004.
It is obviously that there was a downward trend in the consumptions of all types, with the exception of chicken. Between 1979 and 1989, the beef was the highest meat consumption. From after 1989 to 2004, however, the consumption of chicken increased significantly and became the highest one at the end.
According to the graph, 220 grams of beef was weekly consumed in 1979. Each person, at the same time, ate approximately 150 grams of lamb and chicken, whereas the consumption of fish was just above 50 grams.
Over the 25-year period the consumption of chicken increased gradually and finally reached a peak of 250 grams. Beef and lamb consumptions, in contrast, fell sharply to 100 grams and 60 grams in 2004. The amount of fish consumption remained the lowest figure during the period and finished at below 50 grams.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | olParya | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | nhaxquyeen | 89 | view |
| 2019-04-17 | armiez | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-31 | Dương Văn Biên | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-06 | hieu1910199512 | 73 | view |
- Even though globalization affects the world’s economy and society in a positive way, its negative side should be not forgotten. Discuss both sides. You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and rele 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 73
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011 84
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 83, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...trend in the consumptions of all types, with the exception of chicken. Between 1979 and 1989, the bee...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eriod and finished at below 50 grams.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88554216867 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67724832359 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590361445783 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.6491041405 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.1111111111 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163836571999 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728678696709 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433399394108 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107246134869 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323980939807 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.