The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provides line graph illustrates the amount of consumed fish, lamb, beef and chicken in grams per person per week in a European country in a 25 year period.
Overall it can be seen that the consumption of chicken rocketed by the end of the period and that fish was the least favorite food.
According to the data, in 1979 nearly 220gr of beef were eaten weekly, whereas less than 150gr of chicken. During the years, beef declined significantly and chicken sharply until 1989, when both of them were consumed equally by the country's citizens. However, from that year on, chicken experienced a major increase and finally hit over 250gr per week in 2004, nearly 100gr more than beef in the same year.
Despite the fact that at the beginning lamb had the second place in the consumption, with over that 150gr per week, it shown a gradual fall by 2004, while the preference of fish was 50gr in 1979 and remained almost the same throughout the years until the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Lovepreet123 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | anasrafiq | 73 | view |
- In many countries children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. Discuss both views and give your ow 73
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society. To what extent do you agree with this view? 73
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society. To what extent do you agree with this view? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66091954023 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32184619323 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591954022989 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.9667086218 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.166666667 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0926772013579 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480856429671 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0262520791026 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0626772205829 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211852856622 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.34 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.