The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas.

The given line graph compares some changes in terms of exports of wheat in over three particular parts of the world over a six - year period from 1985 to 1990.
Overall, the figure for European Community increased gradually during the given years.However, the number of wheat exports in Australia showed the opposite trend.Morever, Canada's wheat export figure saw a broad fluctuation in the given years.
Looking at the graph thoroughly, the number of wheat exports in European Community stood at about 16 million tons at the beginning of the period.Then, the number declined slightly just under 15 million tonnes in 1986.After that, it witnessed a gradual growth towards the end of the period.
Regarding Australia's exports, they started at 15 million tonnes in 1985. Afterwards, the figure rose by only about one million tons in the following year before decreasing steadily until 1990.In addition, the figure for Canada fluctuated broadly around between approximately 14 and 20 million tons.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-16 honguyenlily 67 view
2023-12-05 MinhGoal1 view
2023-11-16 nguyenkhangtriem 84 view
2023-11-16 nguyenkhangtriem 84 view
2023-11-09 nguyenanh9182 89 view
Essays by user Gulmiraa :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...reased gradually during the given years.However, the number of wheat exports in Austral...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 162, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Morever
... in Australia showed the opposite trend.Morever, Canadas wheat export figure saw a broa...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Then
...ion tons at the beginning of the period.Then, the number declined slightly just unde...
^^^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
...ly just under 15 million tonnes in 1986.After that, it witnessed a gradual growth tow...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ports, they started at 15 million tonnes in 1985. Afterwards, the figure rose by ...
^^
Line 4, column 193, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...r before decreasing steadily until 1990.In addition, the figure for Canada fluctua...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, regarding, so, then, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31012658228 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.800402306 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626582278481 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.9549197852 43.030603864 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.8 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157079824525 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857610052062 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859122810702 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107201256508 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832329752502 0.0819641961636 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.