The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant.

The graph illustrates data about the different components of air toxins in the UK over a fifthteen -year period between 1990 and 2005.

Overall, there was a remarkable downward trend in the number of contaminants in the air. What stands out from the graph is that industry made up the vast majority for air pollutants in this period.

Looking at the details, in first 6 years, transport witnessed a moderate increase in the number of pollution in the air which soared by 0.2 million tonnes. By contrast, air pollutants with respect to the manufacturing field suddenly decreased from 5.5 to 3 million tonnes. There was a sharp drop in the figure of air toxins from residents which was reduced by half.

In the later period, air contaminants from industry noticeably went down by 1 million tonnes. There was an unstable change in the number of air pollutants from other sources. Air toxins from transport hit a bottom in 1999 and then steadily went up to 1 million tonnes. The same year saw a slight increase in the quantity of air pollutants from households and gradually fell to 0.2 million tonnes next.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-03-31 Linhharty 73 view
2022-01-15 Huy Vu 67 view
2019-07-31 elizabeth.queijo 47 view
Essays by user Linhharty :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, so, then, with respect to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83769633508 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68639962814 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544502617801 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.2441390462 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.4 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208864562857 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942765628381 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437513071186 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144185466113 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324373367354 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.