The graph below shows four countries of residence of overseas students in Australia.
The line graph depicts information about the students who came from Indonesia, Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore in Australia from 1982 to 2000.
Overall, it can be manifested that overseas students from all four countries augmented over the period of time. Notably, the three countries surpassed Malaysia by the end of the period with students from Indonesia found to be the highest.
Initially, in 1982, out of the four countries, only students from Malaysia there staying in Australia and this figure increased from 5000 students to just under 10000 students till 1993. Whereas, the figures from the other three countries were almost negligible till 1987. During the next five years, they rose sharply with only Hong Kong having some fluctuations. From 1993 onwards Malaysia, Singapore and Hong Kong had almost similar figures and they ended between 15000 to just under 20000 by the end of 2000.
Interestingly, there was a dramatic increase in the number of students coming from Indonesia with its peak in 1998 at 26000 students. In 2000, there were 23000 Indonesian students in Australia as there was a slight drop in the interim year.
- Many adults nowadays prefer spending their free time playing computer games why do they do this Is this positive or negative development 56
- The chart and table below show customer satisfaction levels in the US with airlines and aspects of air travel in 1999 2000 and 2007 49
- The graph below shows four countries of residence of overseas students in Australia 78
- Some people think that the government should spend more money on the public service rather than wasting money on the arts to what extent do you agree 56
- Some people think that sports teaches children how to compete while others believe that children learn team work Discuss both the views and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...m all four countries augmented over the period of time. Notably, the three countries surpassed...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 188, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...to just under 10000 students till 1993. Whereas, the figures from the other three count...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16042780749 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51480218552 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582887700535 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7063820719 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.222222222 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206174405923 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934906676226 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724117972126 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134674368647 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386704447141 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.