The line chart reveals how many abroad students from the four different countries came to Australia over the course of 19 years from 1982 to 2000. Overall, all categories witnessed an upward trend during these years surveyed.
The number of overseas students in Malaysia stayed well beyond the others in the first year, standing at about 5,000 students. However, this value possessed the third highest among all in the last year, at proximately 27,000 students. Regarding the remaining categories, the figure for Indonesia, Hong Kong, and Singapore were similar at the starting point, at about 2,000 students in 1982. There was a similar pattern can be seen in the number of Indonesian and Hong Kong students. To be exact, the former reached its highest point at over 20,000 while the latter rose to a peak at above 20,000 students in 2000. Although witnessing initial value compared with the category of “Indonesia” and “Hong Kong” similarly, the figure for Singapore showed a noticeable growth, increasing to 20,000 students in the last year.
- The chart shows the main methods of transportation for people traveling to a university for work or study in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wherever relevant
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
- FEWER YOUNG PEOPLE DO FARMING WORK IN RURAL AREAS WHY SHOULD YOUNG PEOPLE ENCOURAGED TO DO FARMING WORK 84
- Research indicates that the characteristics we are born with have much more influence on our personality and development than any experiences we may have in our life Which do you consider to be the major influence 84
- FEWER YOUNG PEOPLE DO FARMING WORK IN RURAL AREAS WHY SHOULD YOUNG PEOPLE ENCOURAGED TO DO FARMING WORK 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, similarly, third, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18713450292 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60009759559 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0672497112 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.875 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122648953204 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051820985255 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561408247581 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103721080279 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292251971562 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.