The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the information about each teacher's teaching time in 4 different countries at primary, lower secondary and upper secondary in 2001
Overall, upper secondary teachers had to teach the most of their time. Teachers in the USA had to spend the most time teaching.
During 2001, Japanese upper secondary teachers had to teach 700 hours per year. It takes less than 200 hours to travel to Spain and Iceland. The upper secondary teacher in the USA had to instruct about 1200 hours. The lower secondary teacher in Iceland had taught the least amount of time in the four countries with 600 hours for teachers in Japan, 650 hours for teachers in Spain and 850 hours for teachers in the USA.
And for primary school, Iceland still had the least number of teaching hours with almost 600 hours equivalent to Japan and slightly more than Iceland. However, the USA still takes the highest teaching time. The USA had almost 1,000 teaching hours for primary school, making it the highest out of the three countries. This is almost double the amount of teaching hours compared to Iceland. Japan was in the middle with approximately 600 hours.
- People can eat a wide variety of food that can be grown in other areas As a result people eat more food produced in other regions than local food Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The pie charts below show the data regarding the time people spend on smartphones and tablets divided by category 73
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 56
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions 11
- The chart below shows the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 10
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8883248731 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33504745079 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.43654822335 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.4502390811 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5454545455 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204730850817 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857798887743 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654382247865 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137960161396 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557872793235 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.