The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008
The bar chart illustrates the garbage disposal in a country in Europe from 2005 to 2008. Overall, the average amount of waste went into landfill decreased over the whole period. By contrast, the figure for trash dumped at sea followed an upward trend.
In the year 2005, the amount of waste be thrown by landfill was highest, at 1800 million tonnes, followed by the figures for dumping at sea and burning, at 600 and about 500 respectively. There was a considerable decrease in the amount of garbage disposal using landfill, at 1200 million tonnes in 2006, whereas the figure for waste disposed by dumping at sea reaching a peak of above 600.
In the year 2008, garbage disposal using burning witnessed a significant rise to around 900 million tonnes between 2006 and 2008, a rise of 300 in 2 years. By contrast, the amount of waste buried into landfill and dumped at sea dropped to the lowest point each, at 600 million tonnes and approximate 500 respectively
- The diagram below shows the changes of a village in 1995 and now. 61
- People living in large cities face several problems. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller towns? 89
- People living in large cities face several problems. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller towns? 84
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in 3 different countries 61
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in 3 different countries 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76646706587 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54531169781 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526946107784 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3144462277 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15734295848 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935948673298 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964890059633 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128085574954 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501281746797 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.