The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph illustrates the number of books read at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.
Overall, it is clear that within the three-year period the number of books read has increased. While the proportion of books read by men has risen, the number for women has steadily fallen.
From 2011 to 2013, there was a slight growth in the number of books men read from around 3000 books to just under 4000 books before going up sharply to approximately 10000 books. Similarly, the proportion of books which women read witnessed a gradual climb from around 5000 books and reached a high of 10000 books in 2013.
In 2014, there was a steady surge to over 14000 books in the numbers of books read by men. This was the highest figure in the period. In contrast, women read books that had downward trends from 10000 books in 2013 to around 8000 books.
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus, or train between 1970 and 2030.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of spreads from 1981 to 2007. 73
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 61
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 73
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 707.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62091503268 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16646703011 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 180.0 283.868780488 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5923861972 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.375 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304073971165 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16394914117 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117906878591 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242261662813 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114821991995 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.