The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.

The line graph illustrates the number of questions that the Tourist Information Office located in a city was asked by 3 main categories during a 6 month period in 2011.
Overall, it is clear that there was an upward trend in the figure of answering questions by telephone and in person while the opposite trend was true for answering by letter/email. Novelty, the number of enquiries received in person underwent the most dramatic change over the period shown.
Starting at 900 enquiries received in January, the number of answering by telephone fluctuated to 1000 enquiries in March and remained unchanged for next month. After that, this figure increased dramatically to 1600 enquiries in June. Similarly, beginning at the lowest point in the line chart at 400 enquiries, the number of direct questions rocketed and reached a peak at just under 2000 enquiries in June.
By contrast, this office received less enquiries via letter/email at 800 enquiries in the first year. The period between January and May witnessed a rapid decrease in this figure from 800 to 400 before remaining stable in June.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-26 minhnhat2002 73 view
2023-09-01 euphorianmt 84 view
2023-08-03 leuleu28 73 view
2023-07-12 Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn 67 view
2023-07-08 Mindaghcbai 84 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 35, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun enquiries is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ne. By contrast, this office received less enquiries via letter/email at 800 enqui...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, may, similarly, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07142857143 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75248403032 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565934065934 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9947209072 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.375 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284501621242 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128408972535 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114614985006 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181949850661 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105385711112 0.0819641961636 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.