The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given line graph compares the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office regarding the way they were transmitted: in person, electronic or current mail, or by telephone. The data shown goes from January to June 2011.
Queries presented in person have suffered a dramatic rising during the 6-month period, from 400 to 1900.

However, for those requests submitted by phone, the ascend have been less pronounced, starting with a higher number (900 approximately in January) to 1600 in June.

By contrast, although letters and emails sent to the office remained around 700 during the first 3 months of 2011, then experienced a slight drop to almost 400 in May, keeping the same numbers in June.

Overall, the chart shows that even though there was no significant difference in the way of remote communication in January 2011 (around 800 calls and 800 letters or emails) and a 50% less of face-to-face requests, the number of people choosing a personal talk (whether going or calling to the office) now is much more relevant than those who prefer to send a written request.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 49, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... for those requests submitted by phone, the ascend have been less pronounced, starting wit...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, regarding, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00546448087 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64861082446 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.296182883 43.030603864 235% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 152.666666667 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175449560186 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799554426475 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060588488079 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868627896701 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602344455625 0.0819641961636 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.