the graph below shows the number of enquiries received by Tourist Information Office in one city a six-month period in 2011

The provided line graph gives information about changes in the amount of questions the Tourist Information Office received from January to June in 2011. Overall, the number of questions asked in person and received by telephone showed the same upward trend, whereas that of enquiries received by letter or email demonstrated the reversed pattern over the given period.

At the beginning, in regards to the enquiries asked in person, the figure began at a low of just above 400 questions, then the number continuously rose throughout the six-month time and peaked at approximately 1,900 at the end. Similarly, the same upward trend can be witnessed in the figure of questions received by telephone; although, in the first three months the slight fluctuation can be noticed. Between March and April, the number then remained stable at 1,000, but after which, the figure went up rapidly and reached the maximum of exactly 1,600 in June.

By contrast, the amount of questions received via letter or email which started at just below 800 illustrated a downward trend. The number remained relatively constant in the first three months and started to fall and hit the low at roughly 380 in May and stood at the same amount until June.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
... the given period. At the beginning, in regards to the enquiries asked in person, the figu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, similarly, so, then, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02926829268 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60760796023 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551219512195 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.6865134767 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.285714286 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2857142857 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247244378666 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109180796904 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806296545288 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172748920413 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114095018259 0.0819641961636 139% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.