The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates the number of foreign visitors visiting the coast, the mountains and the lakes in a European country from 1987 to 2007.
Overall, it is clear that the number of outside European visitors visiting three different areas all increased during the research period. Furthermore, the areas of the lake experienced the most noticeable change in the number of overseas visitors.
In 1987, the figure for foreign tourists choosing the coast as a tourist destination was highest, at 40 thousand people, while the number of visitors visiting the lakes was lowest, at 10 thousand people. Additionally, there were 20 thousand visitors who chose the mountains to travel to European countries at that time.
From that time to 2007, the figure for overseas tourists visiting the mountains slightly increased by 20 thousand people to 35 people compared to there were a significant increase to 75 thousand visitors in the number of overseas people visiting the coast. In terms of the lakes, The lakes was witnessed a rapid increase of 10 thousand visitors to over 70 thousand visitors in 2002 and became the highest figure, but this number suddenly declined to 50 thousand visitors in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-16 | honguyenlily | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- Some countries achieve international sports by building specialised facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Do you think this is positive or negative development Discuss both views and give your opinio 84
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18367346939 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68019872823 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494897959184 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.8270184428 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.142857143 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198053918585 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117216490035 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490694463497 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150748746885 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516926301278 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.