The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph given compares a nation in Europe in terms of the quantities of foreign tourists to three divergent regions from 1987 to 2007.
It is clear from the graph that during the research period, international individuals tended to go to coastal areas. Additionally, all the figures generally experienced increases in spite of some fluctuations.
In 1987, the coast was the most popular destination among overseas visitors, with exactly 40 thousand people went there, while the number of the lakes and the mountains were 2 times and 4 times as low as that of the coast, at 10 and 20 thousand individuals in that order. To 2002, the figures for the coast and the lakes went up substantially, compared to a steady growth in the quantity of tourists to the mountains.
In 2007, this nation witnessed a dramatic increase in the number of visitors to the coast, to approximately 75 thousand people. By contrast, the figure for the Lakes plummeted to a half of 100 thousand people, whereas there was a slow growth to about 35 thousand people in the number of the mountains.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-01-16 | honguyenlily | 67 | view |
2023-11-02 | tracywu | 73 | view |
2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that success in sports depends on physical ability Others believe that there are more important factors Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poorer countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poorer countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- To meet the growing need for food to support an increasing population a country should make use of edible insects as a food source However some people believe that insects are not only unhealthy but harvesting them will also negatively affect nature What 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83783783784 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85902515478 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8421729858 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.857142857 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0977124157496 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452936800073 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416949687636 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0621927046785 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345685689184 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.