The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007.
The line graph illustrates how many people visited three separate places in a European nation over the course of 20 years starting from 1987
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that all three regions attracted an increasing number of foreigners. In addition, the number of people coming to the lake increased higher than that of the other two areas.
In 1987, There were around 40,000 visitors chose to go to the coast, this figure was two as much as travellers who went to the mountains at approximately 20,000 people. During the first five years, the attraction of the coast experienced a slight decrease to about 35,000 tourists, while the mountains only added up to about 5,000. Since 1992, the quantity of visitors paying a visit the coast rose like a rocket and reached a peak at 75,000 people in 2007. Meanwhile, the figures for the mountains slightly climbed to nearly 35,000 in the last 15 years.
The lake was picked up about 10,000 foreign visitors in 1987. From 1987 to 2002, the lake witnessed a strong soar up to around 75,000 tourists, before dropping to approximately 50,000 foreigners to come to visit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | jolene04121998 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | Dieulinh | 56 | view |
- The table and graph below give information about cinema attendance in Australia between 1994 and 2002 62
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on di erent days 89
- The charts indicate the proportion of money that people in France, Germany and Englandspent on food and other products in 1998 and 2008. 56
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourism industries Why is this the case Is it a positive development 73
- Some teachers think that international student exchange programs would be beneficial for all teenage school students Do you think its advantages will outweigh the disadvantages 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87113402062 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56064710442 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628865979381 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.233886581 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.125 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134628023313 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602331336754 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572624681998 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093104096393 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364899265355 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.