The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004/5
The provided line graph illustrates the trends in passenger railway journeys for three distinct railway services in Great Britain spanning the years 1950 to 2004/05.
Initially, the National Railway Network (NRN) recorded the highest ridership, closely followed by the London Underground. Despite fluctuations and slight drops, the ridership figures for NRN and the London Underground remained relatively high over the years, while Light Rail & Metro showed a consistent trend.
In 1950, the NRN's usage stood at 1 billion, reaching a peak of above 1.1 billion in the early 1960s. Simultaneously, the initial number of journeys on the London Underground, approximately 700 million, remained stable until 1970. From that point onward, both NRN and London Underground exhibited a similar fluctuating pattern. Notably, before surging to approximately 800 million in 1990/91, both statistics experienced a significant decline to 650 and 500 million, respectively, in the late 1980s.
In 1990/91, the NRN reclaimed its popularity with around 1 billion commuters, while the London Underground's usage peaked at between 1.1 to 1.15 billion. Light Rail & Metro, introduced in the 1960s, underwent constant stabilization with minimal passengers. Subsequently, the period from 1980 to 2004/05 witnessed a sharp upswing, with Light Rail & Metro systems recording 200 million journeys.
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future Others by contrast are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than huma 89
- The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club think about the club s activities facilities and opening hours Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make any comparisons whe 73
- Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries What are the causes Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history 78
- The maps below show the Happy Valley Shopping Center in 1982 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1174.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81188118812 4.92477711251 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0567349889 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668316831683 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7084678875 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.4 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.9 5.23603664747 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17313681474 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634213152015 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10570968331 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127190938522 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141503201872 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.4140731707 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1174.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81188118812 4.92477711251 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0567349889 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668316831683 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7084678875 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.4 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.9 5.23603664747 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17313681474 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634213152015 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10570968331 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127190938522 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141503201872 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.4140731707 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.