The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004/5
The graph illustrates information about the number of people going on three railway systems, namely the National rail network, the London Underground and the Light rail and metro systems, over a 55-year period from 1950 to 2005.
Overall, it is clear that there were upward trends in three networks over the period in question. Another interesting point is that the National rail network had a similar change as the London Underground.
Regarding the National rail network, the number of passengers rose gradually by 100 million people over the first 10 years, followed by a mild fluctuation between a high of 1,2 billion in 1960 and a low of approximately 625 million passengers in the early 1980s. Likewise, the London Underground experienced a less marked downward trend over the same period, falling from 625 million to 500 million passengers. Subsequently, there were similar changes in both systems as they increased sharply, reaching peaks at the billion mark. The National rail network finished at roughly 1.1 billion passengers in 2004/05.
By contrast, after their beginning in the 1960s, there were fewer passengers in the Light rail and metro systems as the number didn’t exceed 10 million people over the first 15 years. However, the figure increased steadily in 1980, after which it reached approximately 200 million in 2004/05.
- The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004 5 73
- Essay topics The graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy in the UK 2000 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- Essay topics The graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy in the UK 2000 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, likewise, regarding
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26851851852 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71501628781 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7335648144 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.444444444 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114575340931 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470645051688 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470211282665 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0690899517373 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423568772726 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, likewise, regarding
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26851851852 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71501628781 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7335648144 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.444444444 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114575340931 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470645051688 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470211282665 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0690899517373 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423568772726 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.