The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.

The line graph illustrates the percentage of elderly people who are more than 65 years old between the time period of 1940 and 2040 in such three countries, as Japan, Sweden and the USA.

In 1940 there were only 5% who were 65 and more in Japan, while in Sweden and the USA the number of elder people was 8 and 10% respectively. From 1940 to 1980 the percentage in both Sweden and USA increased gradually to 15%. During the period of 1980-2015 it is possible to observe a slight drop of this population in the USA to 14%, and a steady rise of the number of elderly people up to 23% until 2040. As for Sweden, there was a considerable fluctuation in the percentage between the time period of 2000-2040, and finally reached a pick of 25% in the year 2040.

The number of elder people in Japan had decreased gradually between 1940 and 1960, than levelled off until the year 1985. From that time there was a constant rise in the percentage of elderly people in Japan from 1985 to 2030. Finally, the percentage will increase sharply and in 2040 reach the highest point of 27%.

In conclusion, during the century the number of elder people have increased, and there will not a big difference between the number of population who are more than 65 in 2040 in all 3 countries.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...80 the percentage in both Sweden and USA increased gradually to 15%. During the p...
^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the USA to 14%, and a steady rise of the number of elderly people up to 23% u...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, while, as for, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48927038627 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4748360548 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450643776824 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0937173737 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.222222222 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8888888889 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215487670794 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982017053785 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795969617302 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166809567031 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075423267651 0.0819641961636 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.