The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph compare the number of shops that closed and new shops which opened between 2011 and 2018.

It is clear that the number of both closed shops and new shops opened have decreased. Special, the number of closed shop has had a big change in 2015

Firstly, start in 2011, amount of closed shops are lower than amount of new shops opened, while the number of closed shops in 2011 was about 6300 shops, the number of new shops opened was about 8500 shops

The amount of closed shops tend to increased from 2011 to 2014, them it has a dramatically drop in 2015, there were about 600 shops closed in this year. Then it rose to 5200 shops again and become stable. From 2011 to 2018, number of closed shops fell to 1400 shops. Besides, amount of new shops opened tend to go down but there was a rise in 2014. Over a period of 7 years starting from 2011, number of new shops opened fell about 5500 shops.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-26 hahoaan 73 view
2024-08-11 brew 78 view
2024-08-11 brew view
2024-08-02 brew 67 view
2024-05-22 Tường Vân 89 view
Essays by user brew :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ew shops opened have decreased. Special, the number of closed shop has had a big ...
^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...creased from 2011 to 2014, them it has a dramatically drop in 2015, there were ab...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 746.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.33720930233 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.80236309038 2.65546596893 68% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470930232558 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 198.9 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 123.518320545 43.030603864 287% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 106.571428571 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.43006707076 0.215688989381 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.263308119339 0.103423049105 255% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124578100897 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.361034749725 0.15604864568 231% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655182014565 0.0819641961636 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.19 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.11 8.06136585366 76% => OK
difficult_words: 14.0 40.7170731707 34% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.