The graph below shows the number of shops that closed in the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018.
The line graph compares the total number of stores which were closed and newly opened in a nation from 2011 to 2018.
Overall, it can be deemed that the line of closed shops decreased rapidly in 2015 when it climbed up surprisingly in 2016 by just over the 5000.
First of all, opened stores were almost 8500 in 2011 which dropped by 4000 sharply in 2012 while it raised gradually fill 2014 by 6000. Moreover, the line fell down again in 2015 to 4000 which stayed until 2017 when it decreased steadily by 3,000 in 2018. However, closures store slowly down from approximately 6200 to just under the 6,000 from 2011 to 2012 which fluctuated until 2014. In addition, the line dropped significantly by almost no more than 500 in 2015 and again, it raised greatly by just over the 5,000 which stayed steadily by just over 5000 between 2016 to 2018 in a country. However, closures store slowly down from approximately 6200 to just under the 6,000 from 2011 to 2012 which fluctuated until 2014. In addition, the line dropped significantly by almost no more than 500 in 2015 and again, it raised greatly by just over the 5,000 which stayed steadily by just over 5000 between 2016 to 2018 in a country.
- Countries around the world will be facing significant challenges relating not only to the environment but population and education as well What problems will your country face in the next ten years How can these problems be overcome Give reasons for your 84
- Using a computer everyday can have more negative than positive effect on your children Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think residents should keep their streets clean and tidy while others say it is government s responsibility Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed in the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 67
- Some believe that money for education should mainly be spent on better computers while others believe it would be better spent on teachers Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6261682243 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31457046552 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.401869158879 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9042770163 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128882389954 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732798229953 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760814662779 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139279929436 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916918905835 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 78.93 61.2550243902 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.