The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph below describes the number of people who travel to a Caribean island from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, the total of travelers rose considerably. Both tourists stayed on cruise ships and those who book on Island increased dramatically.
The number of guests who lived on the island was 0.7 million people in 2010 then maintained this number in the next year. By contrast, there was a notable rise of tourists who went and stayed on the island to 1.5 million people before unchanging it in the next 2 years. While the figure of people decided overnight on the island decreased slightly to 1.3 million people in 2016, it restored to 1.5 million people in the last year.
On the other hand, travelers on cruise ships were lower than 0.5 million people in 2010 then grow to 0.5 million in 2011. The number of people who lived on cruise ships returned to less than 0.5 million people in 2012. However, this figure rose rapidly to 2 million people in 2017.
Total 1 million people visited Caribean island in 2010 before reaching the peak at 3.5 million people in 2017.
- more and more people now own cars What are the problems associated with an increase in the usage of private cars How these problems can be solved 56
- Task 1 The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometers traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- the charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below describes the number of people wh...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69473684211 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29956035784 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447368421053 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4647501145 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126341372098 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699832295839 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619464148238 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103389627478 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630476829127 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.