the graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017. summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The given line graph below shows the number of tourists who visited an island in the Caribbean from 2010 to 2017.
It can be clearly seen that the main trend is a fluctuation in the first three years and then a steady rise in the remainder of the time between the number of visitors who stayed on the cruise ship and those who chose to stayed on island. Besides that, the total amount of tourists rose steadily throughout the length of time.
Now turning to the details. In 2010, there are 250.000 tourists that stayed on their ships, and the rest (750000 visitors) stayed on island, in the total of 1 million visitors. In the next 2 years, while the number of people who stayed on island remained unchanged in 2011, and then a sharp rose in the year of 2012 with over fourth fifth of total. On the other hand, in the period of 2011- 2013 the number of people stayed on ships had fluctuated, from 250000 to 500000 and back to 250000 people. Between 2013 and 2015, the total number of tourists have almost double up, from 2 million to 2.75 million. The data of tourists who stayed on island remain the same in that three years, at 1.5 million tourists, while the number of visitors that were staying on cruise ship have gradually increase to 1,25 million tourists in 2015. In the following year, the total number of tourist stayed the same, which is 2 and three fourths millions of visitors. The amount of tourists that stayed on cruise ship surged to one and a half million in the year of 2016. On the contrary, the number of tourists that were staying on island dropped 250 thousand people, with the remaining of 1.75 million tourists. In the final year of the graph, 2 million tourists were staying on their ships and 1.5 million tourists were staying on island, in total of 3.5 million visitors.
In summary, the total number have an upward trend, while two other statics have oscillations in numbers in the years between 2010 and 2017.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 784, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
...e staying on cruise ship have gradually increase to 1,25 million tourists in 2015. In th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, then, while, in summary, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 3.15609756098 412% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 33.7804878049 225% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 965.302439024 165% => OK
No of words: 351.0 196.424390244 179% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53561253561 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 3.73543355544 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18626397408 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.421652421652 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 283.868780488 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 16.0 3.36585365854 475% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5505003044 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0714285714 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190023703247 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890682070741 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887510615513 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180859529936 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119560661514 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.94 61.2550243902 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.77 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.