The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrate, the number of voyagers staying a singular Caribbean peninsula from 2010 to 2017.

Overall, between 2010 and 2017, number of tourists increased about from 0.3 million to 3.5 million. And Number of visitors staying on cruise ships sharp rise over from 0.35 million to 2 million again number of voyagers calling on island reach a plateau almost from 0.8 million to 1.5 million.

Number of journeyers staying on island gradual approximately increase from 0.8 million to 1.5 million between 2011 and 2013. While the number of tourists remaining on the cruise vessel in 2012, in 2016 it jumped fivefold. That is, 1.5 million tourists traveled to the Caribbean island. Between 2012 and 2014 total number of trippers stopping Caribbean atoll dramatic rise from 1.5 million to 2.5 million. Number of trippers staying in island decreased by 0.3 million compared to the previous year. The number of visitors staying on cruise ships hit a trough in 2010 and 2012. In 2017, the total number of tourists visiting a Caribbean peninsula rose 3.5 million.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10227272727 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46525441666 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460227272727 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6101175243 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 5.23603664747 10% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197729806419 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120748276137 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561453841853 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164486674091 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376021982708 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.